Obviously, any fair-minded person can see that this war was not a case of Japan “invading” China and I say that as someone who is a big supporter of the late Qing Empire. The Japanese had been attacked numerous times and finally took action to protect the Japanese people and Japanese interests in Korea and send the message to China that the Empire of Japan would not be bullied. The way it worked out, as most know, is that China was disastrously defeated which shocked the rest of the world as no one expected that a small country like Japan, which only recently began interacting with the rest of the world, would be able to defeat the traditional regional power of China. From that point until the end of World War II, the Empire of Japan was the new regional super-power of East Asia. There are a number of lessons China could draw from this defeat and for the most part, the country did so long ago. Things like the need for a unified military command, a centralized authority, problems with discipline, training and corruption were all identified and China has known about this and tried to remedy these problems for a long time. The panel did make mention of the fact that corruption in the army is still a concern in China today, but that was quickly brushed aside because, as the panelists said, they did not want to tarnish the “glorious” reputation of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army. I suppose by “glorious” they mean slaughtering peaceful Tibetan Buddhists or defenseless students protesting for basic freedom because other than that, the PLA does not have much of a record of success behind it.
This panel sat there and claimed that the massive military buildup of China was good for everyone because it would contribute to the “peace and stability” of East Asia while at the same time, these same men claimed that even the most modest steps to improve self-defense by Japan were acts of unwarranted “aggression”. They also brought up the expected line about China, Russia and South Korea needing to work together to preserve the post-World War II “world order” by which they mean keeping Japan weak, isolated and submissive. That is, of course, how the Red Chinese use history as a weapon rather than an educational tool. They will always invoke World War II to try to maintain anti-Japanese hostility and to cast themselves in a positive light. However, if anyone cared to note the facts, they would remember that neither the Red Chinese, Russian Federation or Republic of Korea even existed at the time of World War II and the Chinese communists certainly played no part in defeating Japan. They barely took part in the fighting at all, simply being content to sit back and allow the Kuomintang to carry the burden while they waited to pounce when it was over.
It is clear that Communist China will never relent in their hatred of Japan and their military build-up, even while having enough to overpower every continental neighbor, is proof of their hostile intentions. The pro-peace and passivity crowd in Japan need to realize that the time is near which will decide whether Japan will be an independent nation or a servant of Red China. If Japan wishes to remain an independent country, it is necessary to take defense more seriously and stop allowing Red China to control the narrative and define Japan in the eyes of the world. Decisive action must be taken quickly before it is too late.
0 Comments